This is our old Q&A Site. Please post any new questions and answers at

Hello. I observed a quite strange behaviour. If I disable dissectors over [Analyze->Enabled Protocols] panel, they still are registered on their BTP/UDP/TCP... ports in [Internals->Dissector tables->Integer tables]. Is it a bug or a feature? :-)

Best regards


asked 08 Jan '13, 06:41

Ewgenijkkg's gravatar image

accept rate: 60%

This is a known bug. There was a discussion about it on the wireshark-dev mailing list last year, but no formal bug report has been opened for it yet. Feel free to open one.

permanent link

answered 08 Jan '13, 08:51

cmaynard's gravatar image

cmaynard ♦♦
accept rate: 20%

edited 08 Jan '13, 08:52

A feature ...

They are registered but disabled. (IOW: a dissector registered on a port but disabled is not called thus allowing another dissector (e.g., a heuristic dissector) to be called).

The entries shown for disabled protocols should probably have an indication as being disabled.

Feel free to file an enhancement request at bugs.wireshark.ord :)

permanent link

answered 08 Jan '13, 08:07

Bill%20Meier's gravatar image

Bill Meier ♦♦
accept rate: 17%

edited 08 Jan '13, 08:14

The problem is that no other dissector/plugin can register on these ports then! And that should be possible in my opinion. Disabled dissectors should not block anything...

(08 Jan '13, 08:14) Ewgenijkkg

I think a bit of thought and work might be required to do something like this.

As noted, feel free to file an enhancement request....

(08 Jan '13, 08:18) Bill Meier ♦♦

Done :) Thanks!

BR Ewgenij

(08 Jan '13, 09:12) Ewgenijkkg
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here



Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text]( "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:


question asked: 08 Jan '13, 06:41

question was seen: 1,831 times

last updated: 08 Jan '13, 09:12

p​o​w​e​r​e​d by O​S​Q​A