This is our old Q&A Site. Please post any new questions and answers at

I'm running Mac OS X 10.5, and while Wireshark is getting along reasonably well with X11 (version 2.1.6 of if I recall), XQuartz ( ) offers a newer version (2.6.3) which was originally developed with Apple's help and from which some enhancements were merged back into the Apple build, but which has since superseded Apple's build (with the important caveat that you can only have one or the other installed, not both, and they 'clobber' each other, in the words of the developers). In fact Apple themselves have dropped X11 in Mountain Lion and recommend XQuartz to those users of Mountain Lion who need X11.

So my question is, would you recommend XQuartz over Apple's original for Mac OS X 10.5? Obviously directed at those using Mac OS X, especially version 10.5.

asked 30 Jul '13, 15:00

Lubo%20Diakov's gravatar image

Lubo Diakov
accept rate: 0%

Be the first one to answer this question!
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here



Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text]( "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:


question asked: 30 Jul '13, 15:00

question was seen: 1,991 times

last updated: 30 Jul '13, 15:00

p​o​w​e​r​e​d by O​S​Q​A