Dear Wireshark Community, I have a question regarding EAR compliance for wireshark community mentioned at http://www.wireshark.org/export.html. Am I correct in assuming that TSU notification(s) have been submitted to [email protected] and to [email protected] so that Wireshark's encryption source code classified under ECCN 5D002 can be eligible for license exception TSU? Regards, Makoto asked 15 Oct '13, 01:01  arf193nm edited 16 Oct '13, 05:11  Bill Meier ♦♦ |
2 Answers:
The notification was sent to [email protected] and [email protected] in 2006: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200607/msg00303.html answered 15 Oct '13, 08:26  Gerald Combs ♦♦ edited 16 Oct '13, 05:12 Bill Meier ♦♦ |
As it's mentioned on the export page
So, I don't think that anybody really submitted code to the mentioned addresses. However, the ECCN explanation for Mozilla mentions this
As Wireshark is also an open source product the same section can be applied (my interpretation!!) In the ECCN explanation for Mozilla, it's mentioned
So, if you think you need a review, go ahead and send the code and/or the binaries to the addresses you mentioned and ask for a review. Please update here (for the benefit of others) if you ever get an answer. Regards answered 15 Oct '13, 06:12  Kurt Knochner ♦ Thank you for your reply. My question was resolved. FYU, I recommend you to refer to EAR Part 740.13(e)(3) (at page 34 of the document updated on July 16, 2013). (15 Oct '13, 20:40) arf193nm good. I accepted the answer of @Gerald Combs for you. (16 Oct '13, 03:03) Kurt Knochner ♦ |
Thank you for telling me the information. I appreciate your support. If the internet location of the subversion repository remains unchanged, your one-time notification would cover subsequent updates/modifications of the encryption source code.
Makoto