This is our old Q&A Site. Please post any new questions and answers at ask.wireshark.org.

Hi,

We are a legal firm and preparing for a client an open source compliance document. According to your website the components is subjected to GPL 3, however when we asked the client to provide us the notice we received the following:

"Wireshark is distributed under the GNU GPLv2. There are no restrictions on its use. There are restrictions on its distribution in source or binary form. Most parts of Wireshark are covered by a "GPL version 2 or later" license. Some files are covered by different licenses that are compatible with the GPLv2. As a notable exception the pidl utility at tools/pidl is covered by a "GPL version 3 or later" license. Note that only the tool itself is covered by this license, not the source code generated by it. The pidl authors do not consider generated code a derived work of pidl. Parts of Wireshark can be built and distributed as libraries. These parts are still covered by the GPL, and NOT by the Lesser General Public License or any other license. If you integrate all or part of Wireshark into your own application, then that application must be released under a license compatible with the GPL. The full text of the GNU GPL and the other applicable licenses follows."

Please advise under which license Wireshark is governed and what is the relevant copyright notice.

In addition, the notice we received from our clients includes a list of 5 other open source software notices, we assume that they are incorporated with the Wire shark software. We will appreciate it if you could provide us with that complete list and their respective notices.

Thank you in advance,

Liron Gerti

[email protected]

972-3-6103905

asked 13 Nov '13, 06:18

Estar's gravatar image

Estar
11112
accept rate: 0%

We are a legal firm and preparing for a client an open source compliance document

???

what are the plans of your client regarding Wireshark and how/why is there a legal firm involved?

(13 Nov '13, 06:58) Kurt Knochner ♦

Open Source compliance docs are pretty common; I've seen quite a number of my employer's customers request them. It's there to say that, yes, you use some Open Source software and to confirm that you comply with the license(s) of that software.

My guess is they probably distribute Wireshark (in either modified or unmodified form).

As to why a law firm? Maybe because they're small enough to not have their own lawyers. Or big enough to need outside ones too.

(13 Nov '13, 11:40) JeffMorriss ♦

Open Source compliance docs are pretty common

sounds like compliance is a law firm synonym for: let's print our own money ;-)

(14 Nov '13, 04:28) Kurt Knochner ♦

As a notable exception the pidl utility at tools/pidl is covered by a "GPL version 3 or later" license.

I don't think that's necessarily true. In the source code of the pidl tool

http://ftp.samba.org/pub/unpacked/pidl/pidl

you can find:

Cite: # released under the **GNU GPL**

That usually refers to GPLv2 (at least that's my interpretation). Especially as the comments in the tool show the following dates.

# Copyright [email protected] 2000-2003
# Copyright [email protected] 2005-2007

As GPLv3 was released on 29. June 2007, I doubt that the tool can be licensed according to GPLv3, as GPLv3 did not exist when the tool was created/maintained.

However: Then there is the META.yml file

http://ftp.samba.org/pub/unpacked/pidl/META.yml

which contains this

license: gplv3

strange, isn't it?

(14 Nov '13, 08:02) Kurt Knochner ♦

Well, I see it as a way to make sure your vendors aren't just using free software without following their licenses (which is actually a good thing from an Open Source software perspective).

I guess the logic is that if you paid for the software then you first made sure that you'd be able to use it the way you want to whereas if some engineer could just download something from the Internet and start using it no one might notice unless you've got strict Open-Source-Compliance policies.

(14 Nov '13, 12:17) JeffMorriss ♦

Not really an Ask Wireshark question, please contact the project leader Gerald Combs as listed on the "About Wireshark" page.

permanent link

answered 13 Nov '13, 06:40

grahamb's gravatar image

grahamb ♦
19.8k330206
accept rate: 22%

Thanks, will do.

(13 Nov '13, 06:59) Estar

Good resources for answering this question include:

  1. The FAQ.
  2. The COPYING file in the source code distribution. This is, AFAIK (but IANAL :-)) the license of Wireshark. You can view this file on the web here (that is the current head-of-tree version).
permanent link

answered 13 Nov '13, 11:47

JeffMorriss's gravatar image

JeffMorriss ♦
6.2k572
accept rate: 27%

Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×23
×12
×9
×8
×1

question asked: 13 Nov '13, 06:18

question was seen: 4,140 times

last updated: 14 Nov '13, 12:17

p​o​w​e​r​e​d by O​S​Q​A