This is our old Q&A Site. Please post any new questions and answers at ask.wireshark.org.

I just upgraded to v1.12.2, and when I do a File->Save As it just looks like a normal Windows file save dialogue, with no options to save Displayed packets, Marked packets, etc. Is this a known issue, and is there a published resolution?

asked 30 Dec '14, 07:33

PaulS's gravatar image

PaulS
1222
accept rate: 0%


Never mind, I see they have moved it to an option under the File->Export section. Why the h.. would the developers make a needless, arbitrary change like that to something that's been in the product for many years under the File->Save As menu? (rhetorical question, no need to answer)

permanent link

answered 30 Dec '14, 07:46

PaulS's gravatar image

PaulS
1222
accept rate: 0%

IIRC it was discussed a fair bit by the devs, the aim is to separate the notions of changing the capture file format (Save As) and exporting particular parts of the capture (Export ...).

You question has brought to attention the fact that the User Guide sections for Save As and Export ... require some work.

(30 Dec '14, 08:02) grahamb ♦

Because "Save as", in 99 44/100% of the applications out there, means "save the whole thing to a new file and make that the current file", and "Save" means "save the whole thing in the current file".

Given that 1.12 added editing capabilities, by allowing comments to be added, changed, and removed, "Save" now became a much more important option. "Save as"'s old behavior was confusing to some - see bug 6640, for example.

So Wireshark, as of 1.12, works the same way other applications work, even if it doesn't work the same way that older versions of Wireshark worked. The change wasn't arbitrary and, given 1) the confusion that the old behavior had (where "Save as" worked differently depending on whether you saved all packets or not), 2) the need for a "Save" operation that saves everything, and 3) the fact that "Save as" in Wireshark didn't mean the same thing as it does in other applications (another source of confusion), it wasn't unnecessary, either.

(31 Dec '14, 16:58) Guy Harris ♦♦
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×205
×42
×1

question asked: 30 Dec '14, 07:33

question was seen: 1,226 times

last updated: 31 Dec '14, 16:58

p​o​w​e​r​e​d by O​S​Q​A