This is a static archive of our old Q&A Site. Please post any new questions and answers at ask.wireshark.org.

Does Wireshark Version 1.10.6 STUN dissector comply with rfc 6062?

0

Hi Does Wireshark Version 1.10.6 complies with rfc 6062.

As i get message method 0*000b AS UNKNOWN.

asked 26 Feb '15, 02:22

shaggy's gravatar image

shaggy
6113
accept rate: 0%

edited 26 Feb '15, 14:37

Guy%20Harris's gravatar image

Guy Harris ♦♦
17.4k335196


One Answer:

1

Apparently not. Even the current master code for the STUN dissector has the following in the comments:

 * - RFC 5389, formerly draft-ietf-behave-rfc3489bis-18
 * - RFC 5245, formerly draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-19
 * - RFC 5780, formerly draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery-08
 * - RFC 5766, formerly draft-ietf-behave-turn-16
 * - draft-ietf-behave-turn-ipv6-11
 * - RFC 3489, http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3489.html  (Addition of deprecated attributes for diagnostics purpose)

And the following methods:

/* Methods */
#define BINDING                 0x0001 /* draft-ietf-behave-rfc3489bis-17 */
#define ALLOCATE                0x0003 /* draft-ietf-behave-turn-10*/
#define REFRESH                 0x0004 /* draft-ietf-behave-turn-10*/
#define CHANNELBIND             0x0009 /* draft-ietf-behave-turn-10*/
#define CREATE_PERMISSION       0x0008 /* draft-ietf-behave-turn-10 */
/* Indications */
#define SEND                    0x0006 /* draft-ietf-behave-turn-10*/
#define DATA_IND                0x0007 /* draft-ietf-behave-turn-10*/

Please check at the Wireshark Bugzilla if there is a item already already open for this issue, and if not create a new one.

answered 26 Feb '15, 03:07

grahamb's gravatar image

grahamb ♦
19.8k330206
accept rate: 22%

edited 26 Feb '15, 09:21

Hi grahamb,

Does any higher version of wireshark compiles with rfc 6062?

(26 Feb '15, 08:58) shaggy

Nope, the excerpts above are from the current latest version of the file.

(26 Feb '15, 09:17) grahamb ♦