Question: We are getting a lot of Expert(error notifications) about TCP Retransmissions, Reassembly error; New Fragment overlaps old data.(retransmission?). The offending packets are happening between a hyperV node and the VMM. Should we be concerned or is this is false positive. both servers are plugged in to the same switch, the hyper V node has a dedicated port and virtual network created for our server lan. The vmm is just a server that sits on the same vlan natively. Summary...
asked 05 May '15, 13:21 Quorrum edited 05 May '15, 14:03 Jasper ♦♦ |
2 Answers:
we are chalking these up to false positives and microsoft doing some thing as usual that they are not supposed to be doing. answered 07 May '15, 13:08 Quorrum |
Well, since every frame is seen twice, did you by any chance capture on a span-port with the source being a vlan? Then it is a capturing artefact as every frame with first enter the vlan and then exit the vlan. When capturing on a vlan, better use "rx only" instead of "both". answered 08 May '15, 04:06 SYN-bit ♦♦ monitor session 1 source vlan 100 monitor session 1 destination interface Gi9/18 monitor session 1 filter packet-type good rx only isnt an option. ad.m.1(config)#monitor session 1 filter packet-type good rx ? <cr> (08 May '15, 10:20) Quorrum good idea i was under the assumption that is was only. i will look in to that. (08 May '15, 10:21) Quorrum I don't have a cisco switch at hand, but it should be something like:
(08 May '15, 10:39) SYN-bit ♦♦ |
also check the switch ports and there are no errors.
sounds more like false positives... but maybe you can upload a capture file at http://www.cloudshark.org and post the link here? It's easier to check a trace than some ASCII dump.
here is a chopped, cap. Any help with this is appreciated. https://www.cloudshark.org/captures/64c49f52f75e
my issues are the dup ACk's and ReTransmissions. These seem like waste of band... Should i be worried about these.