This is a static archive of our old Q&A Site. Please post any new questions and answers at ask.wireshark.org.

Version 2.0.1 freeze when capturing multiple interfaces

0

On Windows, when capturing from multiple interfaces, if you try to stop the capture, Wireshark just freezes and must be forcefully closed. Is this a known bug?

Version 2.0.1 (v2.0.1-0-g59ea380 from master)

asked 04 Dec '15, 09:56

DJX's gravatar image

DJX
6113
accept rate: 0%

edited 14 Jan '16, 12:01

Happens in version 2.0.0 and version 2.0.1

(14 Jan '16, 12:00) DJX

Works fine for me on Win 10 using 1Gb wired and 802.11.a wireless. What OS, are you using WinPcap 4.1.3 (check the Wireshark Help -> About Wireshark dialog) and what interface types are you capturing on?

(14 Jan '16, 16:10) grahamb ♦

Version 2.0.1 (v2.0.1-0-g59ea380 from master-2.0)

Copyright 1998-2015 Gerald Combs [email protected] and contributors. License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled (64-bit) with Qt 5.3.2, with WinPcap (4_1_3), with libz 1.2.8, with GLib 2.42.0, with SMI 0.4.8, with c-ares 1.9.1, with Lua 5.2, with GnuTLS 3.2.15, with Gcrypt 1.6.2, with MIT Kerberos, with GeoIP, with QtMultimedia, with AirPcap.

Running on 64-bit Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1, build 7601, with locale C, with WinPcap version 4.1.3 (packet.dll version 4.1.0.2980), based on libpcap version 1.0 branch 1_0_rel0b (20091008), with GnuTLS 3.2.15, with Gcrypt 1.6.2, without AirPcap. Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9650 @ 3.00GHz, with 8191MB of physical memory.

Built using Microsoft Visual C++ 12.0 build 31101

Intel ET in LACP Marvell 88E8056 in LACP

(14 Jan '16, 16:21) DJX

All looks fairly vanilla, does it also happen with the legacy version (wireshark-gtk.exe)?

(15 Jan '16, 15:21) grahamb ♦

It may just be too much traffic hitting the card. Try to capture with dumpcap instead. I just added a section on that at the bottom of this blog post:

https://blog.packet-foo.com/2013/05/the-notorious-wireshark-out-of-memory-problem/

(16 Jan '16, 07:22) Jasper ♦♦