Hi All In parallel to my last question regarding different (MPLS) packet presentation in V2 , i have the same problem with ESMC (Sync-E) packets: in V1 (attached here picture) i can see that these packets are ESMC, and i can also see the clock quality and additional parameters (all is correctly perfect presented by WS V1) in V2 i can see these packets only as "slow protocol" without any details regarding the ESMC parameters, you can see the V2 output here: https://www.cloudshark.org/captures/0f90f2c2de86 can it be that V2 is less advanced as V1 ?? Thanks Eyal P asked 31 Aug '16, 02:51 eyalp edited 31 Aug '16, 02:53 |
One Answer:
I wouldn't say "V2 is less advanced than V1", I would say "the revision of Slow protocols dissector used in your particular 2.0.x has a bug preventing it from properly recognizing OUI answered 31 Aug '16, 03:34 sindy |
There seems to be an OUI interpretation difference, so indeed, file a bug.
On your behalf I've filed bug 12801 and proposed a solution in change 17425.
It's now solved in upcoming 2.0.6, 2.2.0 and development version.